Political Polemics and being a Nice Guy

A well-reasoned argument is far more effective than images of destruction -- this either bums people out, or makes them laugh, and in either case almost guarantees that they will tune out.

Show them the incremental steps, not the smoking craters, is all I'm saying. Political sites tend become echo chambers, where you either toe the party line or are an imbecile, and this is bad marketing. I see it everywhere; again, it's nothing to do w your politics or LaRouche, just objective observation that some media tactics backfire.

I think Godwin's Law is pretty funny, actually. And I've seen it in web forums a million times!

These people hate Lyndon LaRouche, because with meager resources LaRouche has been effective in exposing them and changing history. These are fundamental issues LaRouche has addressed that go back to ancient Greece and Plato and Socrates. Socrates was put on trial for allegedly corrupting the city and the youth. Actually, he was put on trial and put to death for using the polemical method. Yes, we have to have agape, general love for mankind, progress, the good, etc, but that is tempered by the necessity of using the polemical method. That's why we have the Hitler mustache on Obama, because we are going into end game on this, on the future of humanity.

Otherwise, don't even try to get into politics, because these so-called "liberals" (actually the Tory-Wall St. enemies of Pres. Franklin Roosevelt) will eat you alive. They'll get you to betray everything good you claim to believe in, and may give you a few trinkets if you're lucky.